As I sit here and contemplate the ramifications of
developing distance education for the next generation, I wonder what happened
to my generation. It is very surreal to
sit here and write a blog for an assignment about distance education while I am
participating in a distance learning program.
Obviously the need to develop distance learning further comes from a
need. Each one of us in this class
demonstrated a need and searched out Walden University as a way of meeting that
need. It seems that more and more are
turning to distance education as a way to meet needs. The great thing about distance education is
that it is not limited to any particular field.
While many think of distance education solely for the purpose of
attaining a degree, it also provides a pathway for businesses and corporations
to train employees in a cost-effective way (Moller, Foshay, & Huett, 2008). Perhaps this point alone highlights the
benefits of distance learning.
If I could focus both Simonson (Laureate, 2008) and Huett,
Moller, Foshay, and Coleman’s (2008) study to one group that exemplifies the need
for distance learning it would be the emergence of non-traditional students as
a key player in the development of distance learning. This group is distinguished of course by
their age, but it should also be noted that non-traditional students also come
with already established jobs and, more often than not, families for which they
must provide. The need for a medium that
allows them a way to work on course work or training while providing for the
life they have created is met by distance education. In short, distance education creates an
avenue for easier access to education.
While I mentioned non-traditional students as an example, this is true
for people across the globe (Keegan, 1996). Surely something that can have
tremendous ramification for a vast population deserves to be developed further
and improved?
One major concept that I agree with is the fact that
distance education will complement traditional education, but will never
replace traditional education (Laureate, 2008). Huett, Moller, Foshay, and
Coleman (2008) even present a dim view of traditional education, asserting that
present methods are not working. This
alone is reason enough to explore other options when it comes to education. However, I am not ready to wholesale scrap
traditional education, but some change would be welcomed.
I hope that I am around later in life to witness the full
scale implementation of distance education.
While that may seem weird to read as I am writing this for a distance
learning course, I hope that I can see implementation of a program that
complements traditional education from K-12 to post-secondary and beyond.
Resources and Links
Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W. & Coleman, C. (2008,
September/October). The evolution of distance education: Implications for
instructional design on the potential of the Web (Part 3: K12). TechTrends,
52(5), 63–67.
Keegan, D. (1996). Foundations of distance education.
London: Routledge.
Access online to Keegan book: http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nYkrTWDj5twC&oi=fnd&pg=PR11&dq=non+traditional+students+and+distance+education&ots=UNP9mlbsbZ&sig=pMswIz1v9f9fRonCAI0zaW3mXeo#v=onepage&q&f=false
Laureate Education, Inc. (Producer). 2008a. Distance
education: The next generation. [Video webset]. Retrieved from
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_2643771_1%26url%3D
Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, May/June).
The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on
the potential of the Web (Part 1: Training and Development). TechTrends, 52(3),
70–75.
Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, July/August).
The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on
the potential of the Web (Part 2: Higher Education). TechTrends, 52(4), 66–70.